I had a very fun weekend with two great nights at the theater which got me thinking more about my “Fallen” Heorines blog from last week. Friday night, I saw a play called “Sex” written by Mae West and first performed in 1926 (the original production was a smash hit despite being closed down at one point as “obscene”). The plot of “Sex” had a number of things in common with “La Rondine.” Like Magda in “La Rondine” Margy, the heroine of “Sex,” has supported herself by selling her favors. Like Magda, Margy falls in a love with a naive young man who thinks she is innocence personified. Like Magda, Margy ultimately decides she has to tell her young lover to truth about her past. And like Magda, Margy returns to a former lover. But unlike Magda, who goes back to the banker who has been her protector, Margy marries a former lover who knows about her past, sees her for who she, and loves her. A much more optimistic ending.
Tonight I saw a play called “Lovers & Executions”, a modern adaptation by John Strand of a 17th century play by Montfleurry, a contemporary of Molière. The hero (or at least one of the central characters–a lot of his behavior was decidedly unheroic) becomes convinced his wife, Julie, has been unfaithful and leaves her to die on a desert island. Three years later, Bernard, thinking he is a widower, is courting a young heiress. Julie, who managed to survive, returns disguised as a man and courts the same girl as part of her masquerade, while seeking explanations and revenge. The play, a comedy with decidedly dark undercurrents, deals a great deal with lies and betrayal and whether or not love can survive when trust has been shattered.
Confronting a spouse’s past and mending broken trust are both themes I deal with in “The Mask of Night”, the third Charles and Mélanie book which has not yet been published. Thinking about the book after I saw both plays, I realized I hadn’t yet posted a teaser from “The Mask of Night”. This seemed a good time to post a scene where Charles and Mélanie deal with some of the issues raised by both plays and that I discussed in last week’s blog.
_________________
Charles woke with a thick head, a dry mouth, and eyes that refused to focus. Difficult sometimes to tell lack of sleep from a hangover. His wife was curled against him with one leg thrown over his knees and an arm draped across his chest, though he had a distinct memory of not making love to her the night before. It had been important, though he couldn’t remember why just yet. Oh, yes. The papers in Carfax House. His meeting with Carfax. Mélanie’s attempt to distract or placate him.
Or perhaps to find escape. He brushed his fingers over the hair spilling across his shoulder. Sometimes-especially in the weeks since Colin’s abduction–she would make love to him with a passion that sought oblivion in intensity. She would use fingers and lips and teeth with expert skill, dragging him with her into dark places that were as dangerous as they were seductive. To meet passion with passion was no difficulty, but afterwards as he held her in his arms, grateful that she was finally asleep, he would wonder if she wouldn’t have preferred to go to bed with some anonymous stranger and was only making do with the husband she loved as a poor substitute.
A shadowy image of Julien St. Juste as he might have been in life hovered before his eyes. A dark room filled with books and trunks of Spanish leather. Glasses of cognac. Mélanie in a peacock blue gown. A torn ribbon tossed onto the coverlet or discarded on the floor beside satin slippers and a lacey chemise.
He shut his mind to the images and found himself seeing Raoul O’Roarke in their place.
Mélanie pushed herself up on one elbow and looked down at him with eyes blinking awake. “Do you remember how many guests we ended up with last night?”
“Six.” Charles forced his attention to the present. “No, five. Trenor and Miss Simcox arrived, but Simon went home.”
“I didn’t mean to sleep so late.” She pushed back the covers, letting in a draught of cold air, and reached for her dressing gown. Her dark hair tumbled over her creamy shoulders and the curve of her back.
She must have been aware of his gaze on her, because she turned, half wrapped in green silk and foaming white lace. A selkie emerging from the sea to mate with a mortal. “Charles—“
“What?”
For a moment he thought she meant to let it drop. Then she said. “You wouldn’t be human if you didn’t wonder sometimes.”
“About?”
“Other men I’ve known. In the crudest sense of the word.”
Her gaze held scars that would never heal. He wanted to pull her to him, sweeping aside her words and his qualms. But that wasn’t any sort of solution. “I’ve said it before, Mel. I don’t care how many other men you’ve slept with. But what we’ve always had between us—even at the beginning, when neither of us dared think of anything more—was honesty. At least that’s what I thought.”
“Until I told you the truth.”
“Yes.”
“We had pleasure, mutually exchanged. That was honest. It may have been the one honest thing in our marriage.”
“It wasn’t anything of the sort. It was one more game. I don’t like being used, least of all in my bed.”
“I never—“
“The woman I took to bed on our wedding night—the woman who hadn’t known anything but violence—that wasn’t you. Not the sum total of you.”
“Not the sum total, no. But it wasn’t all pretense. You can’t think—I’m not that good, Charles. That is—oh, devil take it, I am. But I’ve never needed to pretend with you.”
He stared into her eyes, shutting his mind to a host of memories. “That doesn’t change the general principle.”
“What happened between us was never the same as—”
“As what you did with Julien St. Juste? Oh, but it was, mo chridh. It’s not making love, it’s using sex to distract me. Or yourself. Or both of us. Sometimes I think you prefer it that way.”
“It can’t always be sublime communion, Charles. Not for me. It’s been too many other things. A tool. A weapon. A defense. An escape.” She pulled her dressing gown tight about her. “I told you once that my acting abilities deserted me in the bedchamber. That was true when I was in the brothel. I was too young to put on more than a crude show. But later– Sometimes it was sordid. Sometimes it was mechanical. But sometimes—slipping into a fictional skin, making love to someone for the night, knowing it’s just that night. There’s no freedom quite like it.”
She got to her feet. “More honesty, perhaps, than you wanted. I’ll make sure someone’s organized breakfast.”
_________________
This week addition to the Fraser Correspondence is a letter from Charles long before he learned the truth about Mélanie and began to confront any of the issues in the scene above.
I’ve been blogging for half a year now (hard to believe!). It’s a fascinating world. In addition to blogging on my own site and now on the History Hoydens, I do a fair amount of web surfing of other blogs (which of course counts as work
. I’ve come across a number of wonderful blogs by writers of historical fiction and about historical novels including Reading the Past, Romancing the Highlander, Cate’s Journal and Book Reviews, Christina Croft, Risky Regencies, and The Lost Fort. Blogging and visiting and commenting on other blogs is time consuming but also wonderfullly fun, and I get great ideas for my books from thinking of blog topics and exploring my characters through the Fraser Correspondence. I’m already thinking of topics for the next six months…
November 26, 2007 at 10:40 am
Very dark! I love the line: “She would use fingers and lips and teeth with expert skill, dragging him with her into dark places that were as dangerous as they were seductive.” Is Julien St Juste, at least in name, a nod to the Scarlet Pimpernel?
Another story similar to ‘Sex’ and ‘La Rodine’ that just came to mind is ‘BUtterfield 8′ by John O’ Hara. Gloria Wandrous is the original tart with a heart, who falls for her ‘protector’ but is rather horrifically denied a happy ending; he knows what she is, as that’s how he met her, but he still wants her to be something more, or less, even as they are running away together.
November 26, 2007 at 6:56 pm
Thanks, Sarah. It is one of the darker exchanges between them–one of the things I love doing in “The Mask of Night” is exploring some of the issues there wasn’t time to go into fully in “Secrets of a Lady”–either for me as the author or for them as characters. Julien St. Juste is a bit of a nod to the Scarlet Pimpernel, if only as a name. And actually, though I hadn’t thought of it until you mentioned it, he is a bit like a dark inverse of the Pimpernel in some ways.
“Butterfield 8″ is another classic movie I’ve heard a lot about but not seen (which is odd, as I love old movies). One of the things I thought was great in the play “Sex” was that the guy the heroine ended up with loved her as she was and had no desire to mold her into some image of the “perfect wife” or deny her past.
November 26, 2007 at 10:33 pm
Looks like it’ll take time for the two to sort that out.
Very interesting scene.
Btw, thanks for pimping my blog.
November 26, 2007 at 10:40 pm
That’s what’s great about a series–you can deal with problems that take time to sort out, across multiple books
.
I’ve so loved finding other historical fiction blogs since I’ve been blogging! It’s so fun to read and comment on other writers’ views on researching and writing and reading historical novels.
November 27, 2007 at 12:07 am
Yeah, I know. I started blogging in May 2005, and I’ve picked up an ever-growing blogroll since then.
November 28, 2007 at 3:53 pm
The main question I forgot to ask – when will ‘The Mask of Night’ be on the shelves?
November 28, 2007 at 4:37 pm
I wish I had a definite date for “The Mask of Night” to be on shelves, Sarah! My publisher is reissuing “Beneath a Silent Moon” (in trade, with a new epilogue and extras like “Secrets of a Lady”) in May. If “Secrets of a Lady” does well, they’ll publish “The Mask of Night” and hopefully more books in the series, so I’ve been on tenterhooks ever since “Secrets” was released. Hopefully I’ll know something soon, and I’ll definitely post it on my website as soon as I do.
November 28, 2007 at 11:23 pm
I tried to do my part and bought “Secrets of a Lady” even though I have “Daughter of the Game”. Now you’ve whetted my appetite for the third book — here’s hoping you have good news soon.
November 29, 2007 at 12:02 am
Thanks so much, Susan, I truly appreciate it! “Secrets of a Lady” is currently part of Target’s “Breakout Books” promotion, which is really exciting.
November 29, 2007 at 11:17 pm
Checking in late. Thanks so much for the excerpt, I’ve been aching for something, I must admit. Of course, it’s only made me want more, you know! More questions added than answers given.
November 30, 2007 at 6:38 am
Thanks, Cate! I’ll post more excerpts in the future, and hopefully I’ll soon have actual publications news. As to questions rather than answers–you can always post questions on my site. I’m happy to answer (with spoiler space, as appropriate
.
December 1, 2007 at 11:55 pm
Just saw your post on AAR’s Writer Board. I loved Charles and Melanie and their story from the beginning of DotG, primarily because you were willing to follow them into the darkness, rather than simply gesture to it as so many historical romances do. The excerpt assures me that you’re still willing to go there with them through the rest of the series. I hope you will continue to post excerpts.
I will definitely do my part to get Mask of the Night published. I’ll pick up a copy of SoaL tomorrow. Thanks for writing such compelling stories.
anu
December 2, 2007 at 12:15 am
Thanks so much, Anu! It’s so great to know readers enjoy these books! Being able to explore those darker aspects is one of the reasons I really want to be able to continue the series. I will definitely continue to post excerpts!