April 21, 2008
More from “The Mask of Night”–a glimpse of Hortense Bonaparte
Posted by Tracy Grant under Hortense Bonaparte, Mélanie and Charles Fraser, The Mask of Night, Tracy GrantI blogged on History Hoydens last week about the historical background to The Mask of Night, so this seemed like a good time to post another excerpt. Following up on the historical background, here’s Mélanie’s first meeting in the book with Hortense Bonaparte (the Empress Josephine’s daughter, Napoleon’s stepdaughter and his younger brother’s wife). It takes place at the masquerade ball given by Oliver and isobel Lydgate.
I’ve also just added a letter from Evie to Quen to the Fraser Correspondence.
Have a great week and let me know your thoughts on the excerpt!
___________________________
A hand closed on her arm. She turned round and found herself looking into a pair of clear, bright blue eyes, behind a gilded half-mask. The rest of the woman’s face was covered in white paint, bright lip and cheek rouge, dark brow blacking. A remarkably realistic imitation of Queen Elizabeth completed by a red wig, a crown that glittered with real diamonds, and a stiff cloth of gold gown.
“I must speak to you, Mélanie.”
Mélanie nearly dropped her fan.
“It’s me.” The woman’s fingers bit into her arm. “Please.”
Without wasting time on further speech, Mélanie led the way through the crowd to the far end of the ballroom—ducking behind a statue of Apollo to avoid Lady Jersey—and opened a door onto a small circular ante-chamber hung with cinnamon-striped silk. A fire and two lamps had been lit in case any of the guests wished to retire, but the room was empty and the curtains had been drawn across the French windows to the terrace.
Mélanie closed the door and put her back to it. The woman turned to face her. In the lamplight, the blue gaze was unmistakable, as was the soft, crimson-painted mouth beneath the mask.
“I know this sounds absurd in the circumstances,” Hortense de Beauharnais Bonaparte said. “But it’s so very good to see you.”
“You too.” And she meant it, even as another part of her brain screamed that she was about to be sucked into a maelstrom.
Hortense gave one of her sudden smiles. “But you’re wondering what in God’s name I’m doing here.”
“On the contrary. I can hazard a very good guess what you’re doing here.”
Hortense drew a shaky breath. “Have you seen him?”
“I could scarcely avoid it. Though he hasn’t been in London much since his marriage.”
Hortense’s fingers tightened on the stiff folds of her gown. “How is he?”
Mélanie saw the Comte de Flahaut as she had glimpsed him in the three years they’d both been in Britain. Sitting beside Margaret Mercer Elphinstone in a box at Drury Lane. Standing by the pianoforte to turn the pages of Miss Mercer’s music. Waltzing with her this evening. Smiling the smile that had dazzled women across the Continent. “Trying to find his way in a hostile world. Like the rest of us.”
“They have a child.”
“Yes. A little girl.”
“I’m glad. I always knew he’d make a good father.” Hortense hesitated, her gaze filled with ghosts. “His wife—does he love her?”
“Oh, chèrie. It’s difficult enough to know if one’s in love oneself let alone if someone else is.”
“His father pushed him into it. He never approved of me, and now he wants Flahaut as far away from the taint of Bonapartism as possible.”
She meant not the late comte, Flahaut’s legal father, but the man widely assumed to have fathered him, his mother’s former lover Talleyrand. Talleyrand had navigated the dangerous waters of the French Revolution to serve as Napoleon’s Foreign Minister and had survived Napoleon’s first exile to represent the French at the Congress of Vienna. He had managed a to survive yet again after Waterloo in the restored Bourbon government.
“M. Talleyrand’s own position is precarious,” Mélanie said.
“As are all of ours. I know I was mad to come here.”
“You want to see Flahaut—”
“On, no. That is, yes of course I do, but I wouldn’t run such a risk for so selfish a reason. Not now.” Hortense sank down on a gilded settee. “I’m not that girl anymore. The girl who tumbled so blindly into love when I should have been old enough to know better. I told Flahaut it had to end after Waterloo. He had to protect himself. I had to protect my children.” She looked up at Mélanie with a gaze as raw as a bullet wound. “I have no right to ask this, but I need your help.”
Mélanie’s fingers tightened round her fan. The plea had been inevitable from the moment she recognized Hortense, but that made it no easier to answer.
“I know it goes beyond any call of friendship,” Hortense said. “I know you can’t afford for your husband to know the truth–”
“My husband does know the truth.”
“Sacrebleu. How—”
“I told it him last November.”
“You told him—”
“That I’ve been a French agent since I was sixteen, that I married him to gather intelligence, that everything he thought he knew about my past was a lie.”
“But– You’ve been married for seven years. Why—”
“The past intruded when I least expected it. Our son was in danger. The whys and wherefores don’t matter. Suffice it to say, I saw no alternative.
“And your husband—”
“Charles is a remarkable man.”
“He must adore you.”
What Charles felt for her and she for Charles was too private to be shared, even with Hortense. “Charles was a spy himself. That helped him understand.”
Hortense stared at her as though she’d claimed Charles Fraser was possessed of magical powers. “I can scarcely imagine what Louis would do in such a situation. He’d be furious–”
“I didn’t say Charles wasn’t furious.” The sound of Charles’s fist smashing through the wall of their salon echoed in Mélanie’s head. “At first I couldn’t imagine we’d ever be able to carry on a civil conversation, let alone maintain any semblance of a marriage. Even now– It isn’t easy for him. It’s never going to be easy.”
“Mélanie—”
“I told Charles I stopped spying after Waterloo. Which is the truth. And I promised him I’d indulge in no more intrigues behind his back. I owe it to him to keep my word” And yet she could not deny the pull of that older loyalty, the plea in her friend’s eyes, so like her mother’s. “If you didn’t come to England to see Flahaut, then why?”
Hortense leaned forward. “Believe me, Mélanie, I wouldn’t ask this of you were the situation not dire. I didn’t have anyone else to turn to. Two months ago– Mon Dieu, was that an animal?”
Mélanie had already sprung to her feet. Years of listening for the telltale footsteps of an enemy sniper or the stir of a woken child had trained her to hear sounds beneath the general din. The noise had come not from the ballroom but the garden. And it hadn’t been an animal. It had been a scream that was all too human.
April 21, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Hey, you can’t end the snippet there.
I love the way you have with dialogue.
April 22, 2008 at 4:31 am
Thanks so much, Gabriele! And the point of teasers is to make people want to read the whole book :-). Actually, I’m planning another excerpt next week, though I haven’t decided if I’ll continue directly from this one.
April 22, 2008 at 12:14 pm
How far are you shaped by actual history and biography when writing in a real figure like Hortense? Did you build on the bones of her life - birth, marriage, death, etc. - or did she write herself, almost, from research into her character (if such detail is available)?
Some real-life biographies almost read like fiction, but I think I would be daunted to write about someone who once lived and breathed, as opposed to creating a fictional character!
Orczy - my favourite comparison, as you may have guessed - gave life to Theresia Cabarrus, in ‘Triumph’, for me, but her use of powerful historical names such as Robespierre was a bit formulaic (I love the Prince of Wales in her books, however!) Measuring fact against artistic licence is another of the ‘journeys’ into research, to reference Sharon’s post in the previous thread, that always starts with historical fiction!
April 22, 2008 at 3:40 pm
Great questions, Sharon. I did quite a bit of research about Hortense, including reading a number of her letters (in French, which made me so grateful for all those years of it in school) and contemporary accounts concerning her affair with Flahaut. Obviously I have her doing fictional things in the book (like the secret trip to England), but when writing a real historical character, I try to stick to things that that person *might* have done, based on what’s known about them (for instance, if a woman was known for her many love affair, I’d feel okay inventing a fictional one for her, but I’d feel wrong writing a novel in which a real historical person who was a famously virtuous wife never known to have strayed had an ilicit liaison. It’s always a challenge getting into the head of a real person–I know what my fictional characters are thinking because I invented them, but even with lots of primary source material you can never known precisely what goes on in a real person’s head. That’s why I prefer fictional characters as my main characters. But I find real historical characters a fun challenge. I also really enjoyed writing Lord Castlereagh in “Beneath a Silent Moon.”
April 23, 2008 at 4:15 am
Ok, question; wouldn’t Hortense be *very* unwelcome in an English household? Many Brits still think of Napoleon as Evil Incarnate.
*Sigh* I suppose I’ll have to wait for Mask of Night to come out.
April 23, 2008 at 4:25 am
*Very* unwelcome–in the book, she’s come to Britain in secret (which she never did in real life as far as the historical record goes). She’s at the ball incognita, which she can do because it’s a masquerade. That’s what makes it so precarious for Mélanie–she can’t even tell Charles she’s seen Hortense. And the murder that’s discovered at the ball makes that even more complicated.
Hortense’s former lover Flahaut was having a precarious enough time in Britain at this time. He was accepted socially many places (he was very popular with the ladies) but at the time of “The Mask of Night” (January 1820), his wife’s father, Admiral Keith, hadn’t yet accepted the marriage. Margaret Mercer Elphinstone had married Flahaut in defiance of her father (who did come round eventually).
I don’t mind answering questions about “Mask”–the plot’s complicated enough that there’ll be plenty of surprises left :-).
April 23, 2008 at 5:29 pm
I’ve just Wiki’d Hortense and her lover Flahaut, and their lives were wonderfully intriguing and romantic. Did Hortense object to being married off by Napoleon? It sounds like she made the best of a bad situation, and was able to protect herself and her children whatever the political climate.
Also, I’ve just realised that another of Flahaut’s lovers, the Countess Potocka, is herself the subject of artistic licence in Eve Stachnyak’s ‘Garden of Eden’ (which I think I have already plugged here!) I can’t remember how Flahaut was described, though - I shall have to read it again soon!
April 24, 2008 at 7:32 am
Aren’t Hortense and Fahaut interesting, Sarah? Sometimes real history defies what my imagination can come up with. Apparently Hortense didn’t want to marry Louis and was persuaded to agree by both Napoleon and Josephine. But from my research, it also seems to me that Hortense and Louis’s relationship really fell apart when their first son died. Losing a child is a strain on any marriage, let alone one lived in the public eye (the child had been named Napoleon’s heir). Louis’s an interesting person too–he was an intelligent man who did his best to be a good king of Holland and abdicated when he felt he could no longer do so.